To conclude, from a theoretical point of view, China has generally formed a mature operation pattern for the sharing economy in the mobility industry, which will contribute to its sustainability. From a practical point of view, China’s vast market size shared with the advanced Internet technology powerfully drives the sustainability of China’s sharing economy in the mobility industry. Although the supervision system of China’s sharing mobility industry may not be well equipped to some extent, under the multi-party regulatory approach, China’s sharing economy in the mobility industry will develop in a more complete, more energetic, and more sustainable direction.
Reference
Curtis, S. K., & Lehner, M. (2019). Defining the Sharing Economy for Sustainability. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 11(3), 567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030567
Hu, H., Huang, T., Cheng, Y., & Lu, H. (2019). The Evolution of Sustainable Business Model Innovation: Evidence from a Sharing Economy Platform in China. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 11(15), 4207. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154207
Jiang, H., & Wang, H. (2020). CHINA’S REGULATORY APPROACH TO THE SHARING ECONOMY: A PERSPECTIVE ON RIDE-HAILING. Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, 2020(1), 85.
Liu, C., Chan, R. K. H., Wang, M., & Yang, Z. (2020). Mapping the Sharing Economy in China. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 12(16), 6333. https://doi.org/10.3390/su121663334
Ma, J. (2020). Analysis of the Failure of Ofo Sharing Bicycle Company and Possible Solutions. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 155, 147–152. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.201128.030
Puschmann, T., & Alt, R. (2016). Sharing Economy. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(1), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-015-0420-2
Zhang, D., Shi, Y., & Li, W. (2019). China’s Sharing Economy of Mobility Industry: From Perspective of Industrial Ecosystem. Sustainability (Basel, Switzerland), 11(24), 7130. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247130
Zheng, L. (2017). Sharing Economy: Essence, Mechanism, Models and Risks. International economic review, (6), 45–69.